ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE, COST AND UTILIZATION TIME OF CARBON-SULFUR AND DIRTY SULFUR SOLID WASTE

This study aims to analyze whether carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur solid waste added materials can be used for concrete manufacturing, obtain and analyze the formulation of a 2% carbon sulfur mixture with concrete compressive strength, and the cost value. This research is experimental where this study aims to determine the relationship between concrete compressive strength and compression testing machine tools. The test specimen made in this experiment is a concrete cylinder. The data form of this study is numeric. The conclusions that can be drawn from the discussion for carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur solid waste research are as follows: Carbon sulfur &; dirty sulfur from the results of the laboratory test determination shows that the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) value and total concentration (TK) have not exceeded the Category B threshold according to PP22 of 2021.


RESEARCH METHODS
This research is experimental where this study aims to determine the relationship between concrete compressive strength and compression testing machine tools. The test specimen made in this experiment is a concrete cylinder. The data form of this study is numeric. This research will be carried out systematically following scientific rules that have been obtained previously.
The author will conduct research and sampling at PT. Vale Indonesia Sorowako city, South Sulawesi, and conducted concrete compressive strength experiments at PT. WIKA Pratama Learning Centre Cibubur. The object of research is to formulate added materials with carbon-sulfur &; dirty sulfur materials and material costs arising from aggregate substitution, the use of concrete mix design, and the concrete encroachment time.
Research data is a set of information or information from something obtained through observations or also searches to certain sources where the data obtained before being processed and analyzed can become a fact or assumption. The data used in this study are concrete compressive strength test data and material-specific gravity data. The correct data collection technique will produce data that has high credibility, and vice versa. This stage of data collection must not be wrong and must be carried out carefully according to procedures and qualitative descriptive research.
The collection of data carried out in this study, especially for primary data collection includes the following steps; (a) The first stage is to ensure that the sample used has been tested using the TCLP and LOI methods to find out that the sample is non-B3 waste. (b) The next stage is the sample aggregation process according to the filter number to be used and calculating the specific gravity and material properties of the sample. (c) The formulation Stage is the stage where researchers formulate formulates formula formulas using a mixture of Cs &; Ds and the substitution of concrete-forming materials. (d) (d) The next stage is to justify the compressive strength of the normal sample (Fc) without any added ingredients to be used as a comparison. (e) The next stage is the manufacture of concrete samples with formulations determined based on the number of carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur samples carried. Optimization of sample use is needed at this stage so that there are not many samples left. (f) The next stage is the concrete compressive strength test with a grinding period of 7,14,28,54 and 90 days. (g) The next stage is to analyze the data from the test results of compressive strength testing of concrete with carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur with normal concrete. (h) The next stage is to analyze the costs incurred due to aggregate substitution to the permeation time. (i) The next stage is to analyze the potential utilization of waste with a predetermined formulation. (j) The last stage is to calculate the economic value of this sulfur waste.
Data collection in this study is the formulation of added materials, compressive strength of concrete, and the price of materials used in the mix design process. Research conducted at the WIKA Pratama Learning Center Cibubur Testing Lab.
The research variables that will be observed and become primary data are as follows: (1) Formulation of carbon-sulfur-added ingredients.
(2) Formulation of dirty sulfur additives. (3) Formulation of carbon-sulfur + dirty sulfur additives. (4) Aggregation of filter additives no. 30, 50, 100, and 200. (5) The specific gravity of fine aggregate. (6) Specific gravity of coarse aggregate. (7)  In this study, experiments were carried out in the testing laboratory which was carried out using concrete compressive testing equipment (Compression Testing machine) Data obtained from testing test objects by measuring the compressive strength value of concrete. The data analysis method used is a comparative analysis using tabulations and graphs. The data analysis process of each test result data will be tabulated based on the number of samples of each formulation and calculate the costs incurred due to the addition of carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur materials.
The stages of the data analysis process are as follows: a) Normal concrete compressive strength of the amount of load per unit area that causes concrete test specimens to disintegrate when loaded with certain compressive forces generated by the pressing machine. b) Compressive Strength of concrete due to the addition of carbonsulfur and dirty sulfur then a comparative analysis is carried out using tabulations and graphs according to their respective formulations. c) Each formulation has a different grammation related to its constituent factors i.e. cement, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, and water. From this variable incur costs and are adjusted based on the specific gravity of loss and normality. d) Cost calculation using the AHSP method (Unit Price Analysis of Work) point A.4.1.1.10. Making 1 m³ of concrete quality f'c = 26.4 Mpa (K300). e) Derivatives of formulations and costs are the amount of waste material used and will be analyzed using rigid pavement models to obtain the required grams and costs incurred for each formulation. f) Calculate the economic value of the AHSP calculation results.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A. Testing Carbon Sulfur and Dirty Sulfur as Non-B3 Waste
Thermogravimetric analysis techniques are carried out by measuring changes in the weight of the screw (sample) along with heating on the stagger. This technique can measure, among others, thermal stability parameters, volatile component fraction, water loss, solvent loss, plasticizer loss, decarboxylation (removal of carbon dioxide from amino acids), pyrolysis (combustion in an oxygenfree environment), oxidation, decomposition, charge rate, amount of metal catalyst residue on carbon, nanotubes, and ash percentage weight (Ragaert, Delva, & Van Geem, 2017). All these scalable applications are often made in the industry. However, there are some tests where information can be obtained through the cooling process after heating. There are two types of graphs in this analysis process, namely: (a) Rajah (plot) sample weight against temperature. (b) Cedar (usually in %) mass loss.
TGA figures for carbon sulfur can be seen in Figure 1 and dirty sulfur in Figure 2 both in the temperature range of 25-1000 oC. The estimated loss of ignition (LoI) after the removal process for carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur is less than 10%.

B. Total Concentration and TCLP
The results of determining the total concentration (TK) and toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) for carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur are presented following Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Environmental Protection and Maintenance (Annex XIII) and State Minister of Environment Regulation No. 6 of 2021 concerning Procedures and Requirements for B3 Waste Disposal. presented in Table 1 TK and TCLP values for both carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur are below the total concentration of B (TK B). Even TCLP and TK for carbon sulfur are below TK C.
However, for dirty sulfur, there is one parameter, namely nickel, whose value is above TCLP C, and three other parameters, namely nickel, TPH C10-C36, and total PCBs whose value is above TK C. The TCLP value of dirty sulfur for Nickel is 2.86 mg / L (threshold TK C = 1.4 mg / L). While the total value of dirty sulfur concentration for nickel, TPH C10-C36, and total PCBs respectively are 123, 1040, and 0.04 mg/kg whereas the threshold values of TK Care are 60, 1000, and 0.02 mg / k respectively.

C. LOI and TCLP Test Results
The results of the determination of laboratory tests show that the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) value and total concentration (TK) have not exceeded the Category B threshold according to PP22 of 2021. Thus, carbonsulfur and dirty sulfur waste have the potential to be utilized Based on TGA analysis, the incandescent loss value for carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur waste is less than 10% if the calculation is carried out after the sulfur evaporation stage from the waste matrix. Therefore, to avoid confounding the presence of sulfur against LoI, it is necessary to conduct TGA analysis on products formulated by CS and DS both for solidification/stabilization and concrete filler road base.

D. Formula Job Mix Design Beton
Waste carbon-sulfur (CS) and dirty sulfur (DS) are used as fillers and substitutes in fine aggregates of concrete-forming materials. The effect of adding carbon sulfur and dirty sulfur to the concrete mixture was observed with a squeeze period of 7, 14, 28, 54, and 90 days. Table 1 shows the design mix plan of CS, DS, and CS and DS mixtures. The percentage variation of the mixture used is 2%, 4%, and 6% respectively. CS and DS are 5%, 10%, and 15%. This percentage refers to the number of samples brought from PT. Vale Indonesia has as much as 425 kg with a combination of Cs of as much as 200 kg and Ds of as much as 225 kg.  (2023) CS and DS waste are aggregated first before mixing. As shown in Table 2 each waste will be filtered using filters No. 30, 50, 100, and 200.  Based on Table 4.6 the 15 samples that have been prepared are categorized into 5 param periods, namely 7, 14, 28, 54, and 90 days, for every 2 strong params prepared 3 samples are to be tested, this is to see the pattern of concrete characteristics and the treatment process between sample 1 and others, besides that, it also serves as a sample Economic Analysis and Compressive Strength of Concrete, Cost, and Utilization Time of Carbon Sulfur and Dirty Sulfur Solid Waste backup if the concrete treatment process is not following the applicable terms and conditions.

F. Formulasi Beton + Cs 2%
Making concrete with the addition of 2% carbon sulfur has the following material composition:   Figure 3, you can see a graph of the increase in compressive strength of concrete according to the length of the coating period carried out. On day 7 the compressive strength of concrete with a Cs composition of 2% was still below normal concrete, entering days 14 and 28 there was an increase in compressive strength of 5.36% and 6.31%. Entering the 54th day, there was a significant decrease in compressive strength by 14.35%, and rose again in the 90-day compressive period by 13.9% from the compressive strength of normal concrete. From the composition of the addition of 2% cs, it can be seen that the content of Cs can increase the compressive strength of concrete on days 14, 28, and 90 days. For details of the test results of each 2 sample can be seen in Table 4 below.

Source: Wika Beton Test Results (2023)
The next calculation after the formulation is determined is to calculate the costs incurred, for characteristic K, this term is no longer used in the world of concrete mix design. Currently, the term Fc' has been used following SNI. A significant difference lies in the type of concrete test specimen used. If previously the term K 300 was used to refer to PBI 1971, now the term fc' = 25 MPa is used following SNI 2847-2013. This quality concrete is usually used in construction projects for the manufacture of twostory buildings and is one type of ready-mix concrete that is often used. Table 4.8 is the cost of concrete forming following AHSP PU obtained as a result of a substitution of fine aggregate substitute material for the 2% Cs formulation has a concrete forming price of Rp 1,123,728, -.

G. Concrete Formulation + Cs 4%
The manufacture of concrete with the addition of 4% carbon sulfur has the following material composition:

Figure 5 Comparison of compressive strength of normal concrete with 4% Cs composition
Based on Figure 5, the compressive strength graph using a 4% Cs composition seems to continue to increase according to the length of the boiling period, but it is still far from the normal concrete compressive strength required even though there is waste absorbed. This shows that the more Cs waste added, the resulting compressive strength results will decrease compared to the 2% Cs composition. Table 5 shows details of all compressive strength test results performed up to 90 days. This composition uses quite a lot of waste material for m3 units of concrete, but the compressive strength is never above the compressive strength of normal concrete.  Table 5 Cost of Concrete Forming with 4% Cs Composition consists of several variables that have been determined following AHSP guidelines from the Ministry of Public Works, namely (1) Power which includes masons, head builders, handymen, and supervisors, this item as a constant in the calculation because it is fixed for all formulations that have been determined. (2) Materials which include Portland cement, sand, split, and water, this item changes their coefficient depending on the test results of normal aggregate and cornered aggregate. This coefficient changes based on the specific gravity calculated when the mixture is mixed with Cs. In this case, the coefficient for coarse aggregate is 0.766 and for fine aggregate is 0.355. (3) Equipment that includes the price of the equipment used or the rental of the equipment used for the formation of the beton.

H. Concrete Formulation + Cs 6%
Making concrete with the addition of 6% carbon sulfur has the following material composition; (a) Cement: 366 kg.  Figure 6 below.

Figure 6 Comparison of compressive strength of normal concrete with 6% Cs composition
In Figure 6, the 6% Cs composition also gets results that are not much different from the 4% composition. With a trend of compressive strength that continues to increase but cannot match or exceed the compressive strength of normal concrete as the compressive strength control. It can be concluded that the addition of carbon-sulfur of more than 2% does not make the compressive strength of the resulting concrete much better. Table 4.10 shows compressive strength details with a 6% Cs formulation with a shelf life of up to 90 days. At 90 days old, the composition of this formula reaches a compressive strength of 149.11 Kg/cm², there is a difference of 5.33% from normal concrete.  Table 6 Cost of Concrete Forming with 6% Cs Composition consists of several variables that have been determined by AHSP guidelines from the Ministry of Public Works, namely (1) Power which includes masons, head builders, handymen, and supervisors, with coefficients of each head handyman (0.028), masonry (0.275), worker (1.650), and supervisor (0.083) this item as a constant in the calculation because it is fixed for all predetermined formulations. (2) Materials which include Portland cement, sand, split, and water, this item changes their coefficient depending on the test results of normal aggregate and cornered aggregate. This coefficient changes based on the specific gravity calculated when the mixture is mixed with Cs. In this case, the coefficient for coarse aggregate is 0.764 and for fine aggregate is 0.347. (3) Equipment which includes the price of tools used or rental of tools used for concrete forming.

I. Concrete Formulation + Ds 2%
Making concrete with the addition of 2% dirty sulfur has the following material composition: (a) Cement: 366 kg.   Figure 7 shows that the compressive strength trend in the 2% Ds formulation increases according to the length of the 7-day to 90-day press period, but the compressive strength yield never exceeds the required concrete compressive strength. At 90 days, the compressive strength of the 2% Ds formulation is almost close to the compressive strength of normal concrete of 154.9 Kg/cm2.
Compressive strength at the age of 7 days has a difference of up to 28.36% lower while at the age of 28 to 90 days it is almost close to normal concrete figures. At the age of 90 days, the difference in compressive strength is 1.7%. Table 7 shows detailed variations in concrete compressive strength test numbers that vary with increasing trends but never exceed the required normal compressive strength of concrete.  Table 7 Cost of Concrete Forming with 2% Ds Composition consists of several variables that have been determined following AHSP guidelines from the Ministry of Public Works, namely (a) Power which includes masons, head builders, handymen, and supervisors, with coefficients of each being head masonry (0.028), masons (0.275), workers (1.650), and supervisors (0.083) this item as a constant in the calculation because it is fixed for all formulations that have been determined. (b) Materials including Portland cement, sand, split, and water, these items change their coefficients depending on the test results of normal aggregates and cornered aggregates. This coefficient changes based on the specific gravity calculated when the mixture is mixed with Cs. In this case, the coefficient for coarse aggregate is 0.766 and for fine aggregate is 0.357. (c) Equipment which includes the price of tools used or rental of tools used for concrete forming.

CONCLUSION
The conclusions that can be drawn from the discussion for carbon-sulfur and dirty sulfur solid waste research are as follows: Carbon sulfur &; dirty sulfur from the results of laboratory test determination shows that the toxicity characteristics leaching Economic Analysis and Compressive Strength of Concrete, Cost, and Utilization Time of Carbon Sulfur and Dirty Sulfur Solid Waste